tarpleypymibujuh1491.blogspot.com
Division head Carl finally had to fix the problems in a department run by seniormanager Brenda. He transferrecd one supervisor andthreee high-ranking staff members to other departments. He was satisfied: Once he showed that he could be decisive andcleahn house. But Carl had consistently ignoree advice that the department head wasa problem, and didn't make the changew necessary to keep the problems from resurfacing Brenda seemed to be a nice person and a sympathetic Like Carl, she had an open-door policy. She invited her supervisorse and staff to divulge personalp confidences and to shares opinions abouteach other.
But she never resolved the issuesw that kept them from working together I discovered a dark sidebehind Brenda's behavior. She was both conflict-avoidant and passive-aggressive. Acting as a she carried versions of the gossiand bad-mouthing to other people, but with a twistr that increased resentment and drove wedges between Instead of holding her staff accountable for productivityh and behavior, she reported to Carl that all of them had majort problems. To justify her efforts, she said she'd chattec with her supervisors and and had encouraged them to put theird styledifferences aside.
Carl's permissivenesz allowed Brenda to create a cultureof conflict-avoidancwe and passive-aggressiveness that diminished productivity throughout her Unprofessional behavior included innuendos, rumors and warring cliques, leading to widespread paranoi a and over-reactions. Everyone, including Brenda, tried to look busy whil e theyavoided critical-but-difficult problems and covered their Like Carl, Brenda was a long-term manager with extensive She could explain what good managerz do; she simply never did it. Because she didn'r take effective action, complaints spread throughoutrthe division.
Other department heads mentioned the complaintzs to Brenda and eventuallyto Sporadically, Carl would give Brenda advice and explain his expectations. But he never followesd up. Carl was shocked when corporate headquarters calleds him on the carpet for not beingb aneffective manager. Carl thus was motivatedx to give Brenda a strong talk and amediocrwe evaluation. That may sound like effectivew action, but it wasn't. Brendwa had let things slide for She'd been talked to but she'd always been given promotions when she promisefd todo better. Carl's lecturre was merely more of the same.
The best way to help people be more productive is to make them happy by listening to their hurt feelingsand anger, bein g sympathetic in private and promising to fight on their Brenda's sympathetic listening, but lack of consistenf accountability for professional behavior, created a management vacuumm that sucked into it everyone's hostility, nastiness and personal issues. There are no problem people, only problem processes. clearer descriptions of processesand expectations, and kindly suggestions and hint will cure all misunderstandings. Well-meaning and intelligent peopl e at all levels in the compangy will put professional behavior and team goale ahead ofpersonal agendas.
Carl and Brenda ignored the widespreads evidence that some peoplesimplyg didn't like each other and wouldn't and that for some personal agendas took precedence over companyy goals. Also, some people behave decentlu only when they are actually held accountabld bymeaningful consequences. Othersw won't behave, no matter what.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment